Creating and Maintaining an In-House Style Guide

The editing team participated in an Editors Canada webinar in January 2017: “Creating and Maintaining In-House Style Guides” presented by Elizabeth Macfie. It was a great webinar, and I’m sure we will discuss her ideas often in 2017 as we improve and revise our OL style guide.

Elizabeth covered her process for building and maintaining a style guide, and she offered some suggestions and examples for how to organize a style guide and how to get admin and peer “buy-in” for the project.

The presentation started with an informal poll of participants, and 73% of the editors in her seminar already have and use an in-house style guide.

Some of the points covered include:

  • Start the revision by agreeing on a statement of goals, list of users, and a distribution method
  • Get explicit support from upper management at the beginning
  • Decide on the project management parameters (e.g., file naming, she recommended Trello to record and track steps in the process)
  • Send out an initial email to all staff with a questionnaire and a “prize” for participation.
    • What is a style guide? Why we use one? What content will be included/excluded? How to contribute to the revision? Etc.
  • Set-up a template that includes the following:
    • Welcome and purpose of the guide
    • Contact info
    • Reference guides (e.g., style manuals, default dictionary)
    • Summary of most looked-up items
    • Summary of changes to the previous guide(s)
    • Perhaps tips on writing for our academic purpose and to an intercultural readership
    • Style choices with examples (the core of the style guide)
    • Appendix (may include examples of style sheets used in specific courses or programs)
  • Review our current guides and decide what is useful and what should be deleted or revised
    • The basis for making these choices are our documents (courses), the reference dictionary and style manuals, academic conventions, our good judgement, Google nGrams or Springer Exemplar
  • Periodically send drafts for approval or input to highlight the new content and review changes
  • Roll-out of new guide: She had two suggestions (1) introduce the new guide at a launch (town hall/memo) meeting with senior management, (2) send it out incrementally in group emails or e-newsletter.
  • Revisions: Update it based on input from users once per year. Ask users what info they look up or what info would be useful for them.

Similar Posts

  • Updates to Course Guide URLs

    Required Hardware, Software, Computer Skills, and Other Resources • change to http://www.tru.ca/distance/services/student-orientation/technical-basics.html Technical Support change two URLs: • “…the correct hardware and software required for your course at http://www.tru.ca/distance/services/student-orientation/technical-basics.html.” • “… go to the IT Service Desk at http://www.tru.ca/distance/contact/helpdesk.html.” Student Café • Change to http://www.tru.ca/distance/services/student-orientation/online-discussions.html

  • Online Readers Need Structure

    Non-verbal cues are missing in most online courses, so it can be helpful for readers if we incorporate clear design concepts. Headings should be descriptive and show the hierarchy of ideas. Visual aids help orient students to the course. Learning activities, like asking students to summarize or rephrase in a learning journal, work as verification techniques to reinforce the…

  • Fairness to All

    A few years ago Mona Hall, Danielle Collins, and I collaborated on an infographic about inter-culturalization of the curriculum. Our central question was: How will we create learner-centred courses for culturally and linguistically diverse readers? We found that the university has some excellent guiding policies and resources for educators, but it did take some effort to…

  • |

    Editors Meeting Notes for Oct. 9, 2019

    Attendees: Chris, Cory, Courtney, Justin, Mona, Dani Date  Time 10/9/2019 11:00 AM Location OL344 Notetaker: Cory Stumpf – Timekeeper: Chris Ward (unofficially) 😉 What is a reasonable expectation for internal review? Course Guide components, assignment titles and marks, etc. Assessments: marks (do they add up?) / grading criteria Headings Consistency (of capitalization, titles, etc.) Check…