Editors Meeting Notes for Oct. 23, 2019
Attendees (in alphabetical order): Chris, Cory, Courtney, Dani, Justin, and Mona
Time: 11:00 am Location: OL344
Notetaker: Justin Timekeeper: Collective effort
Notes
- Pop survey on our website:
-
- What’s working on the website? – working well as a reference tool for editors, layout, content
- What would you like to see on the website? – more contribution from other editors, enlarge target audience to include other stakeholders and course developers, more subsections to reduce scrolling, increase access to site, OER support resources
- Who is the intended audience of the website? – Editors, IDs, Curriculum Services, Production, possibly OLFMs and other course developers
Topic 1: Editors Website
- Discussion kicked-off on website elements
- Original intent of website, as told by Chris:
-
- History involves input from an array of sources
- Basically, most recent approved policy sent via email was uploaded to wiki
- This linear process became the 1st generation of what we now know as the website
- Rapid-fire emails—sometimes several in a week—drove the need for continual updates
- Despite upgrading from wiki to WordPress website, this process became overwhelming
- Blog section on WordPress site was initially intended to capture approved policy emails
- New editors have and should continue to have access to resources for onboarding purposes
- Now meeting minutes are being added to blog – Note: needs new heading
- Website is accessible to the public, though historically very low traffic
- Publicly shared site can raise our professional profile at institution level and beyond
- On one hand, privacy is a concern, but transparency is the payoff
- Website as a platform allows us to advocate and educate
- Can/should serve as an archive for in-house creations, PD events, and progressive resources
- Diversity of purpose(s) speaks to the need for differing sources of input; needs full team effort
- Note to discretion: policy updates reworded/names removed before publicly shared
- Some website elements can/should remain private (e.g., meeting minutes)
- Intent of this new endeavor is to have a dynamic site, not static
- Leadership will need updates as we continue forward to account for our time spent on this
- How will Leadership measure success?
- Photo gallery to be included, since this adds a needed human element
- Complex items like CG have both static and dynamic elements; could be divvied up into tabs
- Media and/or Production could help out with layout, but content is on us
- New hire/onboarding docs could easily be added
- Blog sections could include Policy, PD, Meeting Minutes (private), Agenda Items (private)
- Tabs could include Blog, Resources, About Us (similar to LinkedIn)
Next Discussion:
- Update CG and Style Guide
- Resources and References
- Captions and Credit Lines
- Revisit Process Mapping